We helped acquire 40+ tier-1 sellers for Southeast Asia's top e-commerce platform — in 2 months.

Southeast Asia's top e-commerce marketplace hired us to help acquire sellers during a window of platform-fee disruption. In under 2 months, we enriched public seller data into a reachable contact pool at a 53% conversion rate, ran multi-channel outreach across 6 channels, and delivered 120+ qualified meetings— onboarding 40+ tier-1 sellers and counting.

When a major SEA competitor marketplace raised platform fees and tightened seller policies in mid-2025, the client saw a rare acquisition window — sellers were unhappy, actively searching for better margins, and ready to switch. The catch: no first-party data on those competitor sellers, no established outbound motion to reach them, and a closing window that would not stay open indefinitely.

Meet the client.

Southeast Asia's leading e-commerce marketplace — Alibaba Group backing, established logistics, payments and marketing infrastructure, and deep SEA retail penetration, with a recognized seller-onboarding playbook for sellers who choose to switch. The product was ready; the question was reach.

Southeast Asia's leading e-commerce marketplace · a 9-week seller-acquisition sprint.

A rare acquisition window, no way to reach it.

The client hired us to run the full seller-acquisition sprint: identify the right sellers, surface their contact details from public data, reach them on the channels they actually use, and book qualified meetings with their internal commercial team — fast.

1. No first-party data on competitor sellers. The client had its own seller database but zero direct access to who sells on competing platforms — reaching them required external data acquisition from scratch.
2. A time-sensitive market window. Seller acquisition windows don't stay open. Competitors react with retention offers, policy reversals, or counter-acquisition motions within weeks — speed was the constraint, not coverage.
3. Channel-fragmented decision-makers. SEA e-commerce sellers don't live on one channel — WhatsApp for daily business, Marketplace Chat for buyer inquiries, Instagram for brand, phone for urgent decisions. Single-channel outreach would have hit a wall at 10-20% coverage.
4. Pitch fragility. Sellers needed more than contact — they needed an economic case to switch. Lower commission alone isn't enough; the pitch had to surface onboarding support, marketing subsidies, and seller-experience differentiators.
5. No pre-existing outbound motion at this scale. The client's internal commercial team was built for inbound seller signups and existing-seller account management — not a several-thousand-lead, 6-channel outbound sprint. We had to be the outbound motion, not just augment it.

Our build.

We started with a market-intelligence phase before touching the outreach engine. The competitor fee disruption was public knowledge, but which sellers were most likely to switch — and which channels reached them — required data we didn't yet have. Only after a 2-week scoping pass did the outbound engine go live.

Timeline

• End Wk 1: ICP framework finalized — Official Stores, Power Merchants, Brand Stores
• End Wk 2: Reachable contact pool enriched — 53% enrichment conversion
• Wk 4: Full reachable pool in active outreach across 6 channels
• Wk 9: 120+ meetings booked and completed at a 95% show rate

1. Data Enrichment + ICP Definition

Strategic reasoning

The single biggest risk in a seller-acquisition sprint is reaching the wrong sellers fast. Spending 2 weeks on data enrichment and ICP segmentation up front was the difference between 5,000 high-fit conversations and 5,000 noisy ones.

• Scraped competitor marketplace data as the primary source — product descriptions, shop information, and reviews yielded 55% of acquired contacts.
• Cross-referenced Instagram, Google Maps, official websites, and WHOIS records — filled the contact-pathway gaps beyond the primary source.
• Enriched raw seller data into a reachable contact pool — a 53% enrichment-conversion rate.
• Clustered sellers by vertical — FMCG (30%), Electronics (9%), General Merchandise (9%), Fashion (5%), long-tail verticals (~47%).

2. Multi-Channel Outreach + PIC Qualification

Strategic reasoning

SEA e-commerce sellers don't live on one channel. The outbound engine had to match the seller's actual daily channel use — not the agency's preferred channel — so we ran 6 channels in parallel with a priority hierarchy mapped per seller type.

• Built a 6-channel priority hierarchy — Phone, WhatsApp, LinkedIn, Instagram/Social DM, Email, Marketplace Chat — mapped per seller type.
• Ran a minimum of 2 touchpoints per lead with structured recycle-and-renurture for non-responses.
• Worked the full reachable pool and connected with 21.8% of it — surfacing named PIC contacts concentrated on the priority channels.
• Converted named PICs to booked meetings at a 71.2% pitch-effectiveness rate — disproportionately driven by WhatsApp and Marketplace Chat.

3. Meeting Delivery + Continuous Optimization

Strategic reasoning

Booked is not delivered. Show rate is the difference between pipeline and outcome, so every booked meeting was layered with a reminder cadence and tight follow-up sequencing to maximize show-up conversion.

• Layered D-3, D-1, and D-day WhatsApp reminders on every booked meeting, plus day-of confirmation pings.
• Offered same-day rebooking for missed slots to protect calendar quality.
• Delivered 120+ booked meetings — a 95% show rate.
• Ran weekly performance syncs with the client commercial team for copy refinement, channel rebalancing, and time-of-day testing.

One platform, three sellers to convince.

The shift, before → after.

The outreach funnel.

Starting from the full enriched contact pool, every stage below is a share of that top figure.

Acquired → Delivered

• Acquired: 100% baseline
• Reached: ~37% of baseline
• Connected: ~8% · 21.8% of reached
• PIC ID'd: ~1.3% of baseline
• Delivered: 120+ · 95% show

What nine weeks taught us.

1. Market-share windows close fast. Speed of execution is the alpha, not coverage. — The competitor fee disruption that opened this window had a closing time of weeks, not months. Going live in Week 3 with imperfect-but-running outreach captured 40+ sellers; going live in Week 6 with perfect-but-late outreach would have captured none.
2. Channel-fragmented decision-makers require channel-fragmented outreach. — The standard B2B playbook of email plus LinkedIn would have hit a 5-10% coverage ceiling. Running 6 channels in parallel with a priority hierarchy per seller type produced a 21.8% connection rate — roughly 3x what single-channel would have delivered.
3. Data enrichment is the unlock, not a chore. — Without a reachable contact pool, there is no outbound engine. The 53% enrichment conversion from raw public data represents two weeks of unglamorous, high-leverage work that determined whether the entire 9-week sprint had a chance.
4. Pitch by seller tier, not by template. — Official Stores, Power Merchants, and Brand Stores each hear the same product as a different value proposition. Generic outreach converts at an industry-standard 5-10% PIC-to-meeting; tier-specific pitching converted at 71.2%.