Part of the Ikigai series · one client, four lenses
This is the Funnel & CRO cut of the IKIGAI engagement — what happens after the click. The same story is told four other ways across the Performance Marketing, Performance Creative, and Data & Analytics cuts.
We rebuilt it as a funnel per buyer intent, each with its own offer and mechanism, and re-engineered the high-ticket path from a single cold form into a set of nurture funnels built for a considered decision. The teacher-training path went from <5× to +63× ROAS.
Meet IKIGAI.
Three premium studios in Hong Kong, a five-year following, and a clear value ladder — trial, membership, then high-ticket programs. The brand and the full engine live on the overview case. This page is about the plumbing that moves a stranger to a member to a $6,000 buyer.

The challenge — one funnel for five very different buyers.
The funnel logic was intuitive but blunt: drive everyone to the same trial, and run the high-ticket program off a cold form.
- One funnel for everyone. A first-timer, a lapsed member, and someone who came for a single workshop all hit the same trial page with the same offer — so most of them didn't see themselves in it.
- No path for the people most likely to buy. Returning visitors, members about to expire, and one-time event-goers had no funnel of their own — the warmest audiences were treated like cold traffic.
- The high-ticket sold like a low-ticket. The $6,000 teacher training ran as ads → a long form → "request a callback." A six-thousand-dollar decision doesn't get made on a form; it gets made on trust built over weeks.
- Offers didn't match the moment. The same ask regardless of whether someone was discovering the brand or deciding whether to go pro — so conversion leaked at every step.
- No way to test what actually converts. With one funnel, there was nothing to compare — no structured read on which offer, page or mechanism won.
Our approach — a funnel for every intent.
We mapped the buyer intents IKIGAI actually has, then built a dedicated funnel for each — its own entry, offer, page and mechanism. The media that feeds them is the Performance Marketing cut; here's the architecture itself.
| Buyer intent | Funnel & offer | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Newnever tried us · premium-cautious | Introduction-offer funnel | Low-risk trial → habit |
| Returningvisited, didn't buy | Re-entry funnel | Proof + objection handling |
| Expiringmembership ending | Retention / win-back funnel | Continuity offer |
| Event-onlyone-time workshop | Workshop → membership funnel | Bridge offer |
| Revivallong-lapsed | Reactivation funnel | "Come back" offer |
| High-intentwants to go pro | High-ticket nurture | Webinar · curriculum · early-bird |
A note on what's shown: the working build is roughly 10× more nuanced — each intent splits by studio, season and prior engagement, each with its own page and conversion event. This is the floor of the work, not the ceiling.
1. Rebuild the high-ticket path — from a cold form to a considered decision
Nobody commits $6,000 off an ad and a form. The old path asked for the sale before it earned the trust. We replaced "ads → form → callback" with three nurture funnels that do the convincing: awebinar funnelthat demonstrates the faculty and the transformation, acurriculum-download funnelthat lets serious prospects self-qualify, and anearly-bird funnelthat gives the next cohort a reason to commit now. Each warms the buyer to the point where the enrolment is the obvious next step — which is how the path climbed from <5× to +63×.
- Webinar funnel — see the faculty and the outcome before any ask
- Curriculum-download funnel — serious prospects self-qualify
- Early-bird funnel — the next cohort gets a reason to commit now
2. Match every offer to its moment — then test relentlessly
With a funnel per intent, the offer can finally fit the moment: a low-risk trial for the newcomer, a continuity offer for the expiring member, a bridge for the event-goer. And because there are now many funnels instead of one, we can actually test — page against page, offer against offer — and move budget to the winners. The discount-led Reset Bundle is the cautionary tale: it collapsed at checkout (16% vs the intro flow's 60%), so we cut it. Knowing what to kill is half of CRO.
- Dedicated landing page per funnel — the message, proof and ask matched to the intent
- Offer matched to the moment — trial, continuity, bridge, reactivation — never one ask for everyone
- Structured A/B across the three studios — the test is the strategy; budget follows the winners
- Killed what didn't convert — the Reset Bundle at 16% checkout completion, folded its best part into the intro
The shift, before → after.
| Dimension | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Funnels | One — everyone to the same trial | One per buyer intent, each with its own offer |
| High-ticket path | Ad → form → callback | Webinar · curriculum · early-bird nurture |
| Offer fit | Same ask for every visitor | Offer matched to the moment |
| Testing | Nothing to compare | Page-vs-page, offer-vs-offer, budget to winners |
| High-ticket ROAS | <5× | +63× |
How a buyer moves through the system now.
Enter by intent → tested & compounded
- Enter by intent: The right funnel for who they are — not one door for all
- Offer fits the moment: Trial, continuity, bridge, or pro path
- Dedicated page converts: Message, proof and ask aligned to intent
- Nurtured to next rung: Habit → membership → high-ticket
- Tested & compounded: Winners scale, losers get cut
Results — the funnel, working.
From the tracked window since the rebuild — premium positioning, no discount language.
Honesty note: figures cover the tracked window since the system went live. The 5×→63× on teacher training compares the old cold-form path to the rebuilt nurture funnels — different mechanisms, so it isn't a clean one-to-one, but the direction is the whole point. We left the killed Reset Bundle in on purpose: a funnel that fails is only wasted if you keep funding it.
What rebuilding IKIGAI's funnels taught us.
- One funnel can't serve five buyers. — A first-timer and a lapsing member are in completely different moments. Give each its own funnel, offer and mechanism and conversion stops leaking — the warmest audiences finally get a path built for them.
- High-ticket is a nurture, not a form. — A $6,000 decision is made on trust, over weeks. Webinar, curriculum and early-bird funnels do the convincing the old form skipped — which is how the path went from 5× to 63×.
- Match the offer to the moment. — The same ask for everyone is the same as no offer at all. Trial, continuity, bridge, reactivation — the offer should fit exactly where the buyer is, or it converts no one well.
- Many funnels make testing possible. — With one funnel there's nothing to compare. With many, CRO becomes real: page vs page, offer vs offer, budget to the winners, and the discipline to kill what fails (goodbye, Reset Bundle).
The rest of the IKIGAI engagement.
One of four lenses on the same engagement.
- The Performance Marketing cut covers the media feeding these funnels
- The Performance Creative cut covers the assets each one needs
- The Data & Analytics cut covers the closed loop that makes every step measurable
IKIGAI now runs a funnel for every buyer — and a high-ticket path that climbed from 5× to 63× ROAS by selling a $6,000 decision the way it's actually made.
One of four lenses on the same engagement — the media, the creative, and the data layer complete the picture. This is how GTMLab partnerships work: we map the system, build it, and hand back an engine the client owns.
Book a strategy call →